I believe this was originally published in No-Fi magazine, but I got it from http://www.guitar.com/features/sidebar.asp?featureID=94&page=3 |
Beck Hanson The Tools of Creation When it comes to guitar playing, the author of such alt-rock hits as "Sexx Laws," "Loser" and "Where It's At" probably wouldn't know a Pentatonic scale from a Lydian. Yet, like Neil Young, his simplistic playing scratches an itch somewhere most technical guitar masters can never reach. Beck's guitar, whether noisy, experimental or delicate, colors the tone of his music, allowing his frenzied beats and quirky vocals to go where his creative muse takes them. Here, Back gabs in his soft-spoken way about equipment, emulation, and insatiable effort to evolve. Guitar.com: Are you very particular about gear? Beck: No. I'll use the latest new-fangled gadget, and I'll use the oldest, falling apart piece of crap. Whatever sounds good is what ends up in the mix. I'm not a collector of guitars or amps or anything. I tend to find different guitars for different songs. If I want to sound or the phrasing for the guitar part to sound really deliberate and kind of old, I'll just find the biggest neck guitar with the hardest to play action -- something that will impose itself on my playing -- just one of those shitty old blues guitars. I can't even remember the name of the one I used a lot on this record. But at the same time, I'll play a new Les Paul or a Fender, and I have no patina to the sound. Sometimes I like to play new manufactured guitars that have no real character or charm. Also, I really like to get guitar frequencies out of a keyboard. A lot of times, the guitar sounds more like a piano, and the keyboards are doing more of what the guitar should do. I'm also always interested in getting the bass to play the heavy guitar parts and using the guitar to play more delicate things. Guitar.com: A lot of times you seem to use the guitar for texture as well, almost in place of samples. Beck: With some of the effects that I have, you can really get some screaming keyboard-like sounds out of your guitar. I tend to like the warbly sounds or the very thin, precise guitar sounds -- the kind of distortion that sounds like a dental drill. I like sounds that are emasculated and one-dimensional. Sometimes I get the sound I want by plugging straight into the board, and sometimes it comes from a variety of different amps and effects. Guitar.com: Do you view yourself as a competent guitarist, or is the instrument just a tool to reach your creative goal? Beck: I'm not a great guitarist. I think I got to a point of ability that I was fine with. I can play the things I hear in my head. I can't do one of those ripping solos. That's one thing I would like to be able to do. I'd love to use that as a sort of flourish live. So maybe, I'll go to the woodshed and come up with some ideas. Guitar.com: You can say a lot more in a sparse way sometimes than you can by being very flashy and complicated. Beck: Yeah, you want to illuminate a musical moment, you don't want to illuminate it with 50,000 watts of florescent lighting. It's not a pachinko parlor. It's better to use nice candles to create some sort of an atmosphere. But as far as rocking out, I'm always into the dumbest chords and the dumbest guitar playing -- the sort of Stooges style of guitar rock. I think that stuff is really fun to play and listen to. Guitar.com: It seems we're at a point in the evolution of guitar music where everything has been done, and the only way to appear innovative is by combining disparate styles. Beck: Well, you could say that was true at any point in history when the music was going someplace new. Any time there has been a fruitful period, or there's been some friction and new energy in music it's always been a period where things were joining together and fusing into another entity. I just think that because there's so much music out there, it's so seemingly chaotic. The amount of music out there is so dense and overwhelming that we like to categorize it and put it in different compartments. It just makes it easier to deal with, but music has never been about fitting in certain boundaries, it's always been mutating. I'm sure if you go back to some ancient music you might find it was church music that fused with local folk music. History and the movement of people have always been part of the process and evolution of changing the music and mutating since the beginning of sound. Guitar.com: Have you ever listened to a Woody Guthrie song or a Son House song and tried to imitate or capture the sound? Beck: Maybe when I was younger I might have had a na•vete -- that yearn to emulate something. But I realized very quickly that my talent isn't really emulation. I think the more I continue to learn about what's me musically, the less I have a need to feed off of other musicians. But I think that anybody who listens to a song they like or a musician or a singer, in the listening, they put a certain amount of themselves into that person. And I do that. Guitar.com: You've been described as a chameleon-like artist in the sense that you've frequently bounded between blues, hip-hop, alternative and funk. Is there an intent to avoid being placed in a particular niche. Beck: I don't like to think of myself as a chameleon because to me, a chameleon is someone really dilettante-ish. I'm just more into the artist's journey than the workman musician approach. Exploring is the real turn on for me. I'm always interested in possibilities. I'm not as interested in refinement. -- Jon Wiederhorn |